Versus Challenging Ideas

Ideas come and go forcing you into stepping  back,
counter ideas try to overcome the forceful ones,
a bunch of state arguments fight the battle and try to restore peace,
meanwhile your mind and body enters in a weird emotion of anger....

Objective Motion tries to understand the forceful idea
State Reality would analyze to whom was the idea appointed at.
Far Motion analyzes origin, position level and time elapsed of each forceful argument
State Focus establishes a constant state of not losing control and maintain calm

The State is ready for counter,
trying to set arguments on different visions,
conclusions are set on different angles,
trying to understand what the argument really meant.

"Your position is outdated - get an update and reconsider your argument"
"Your position has nothing to do with your argument - what was that for then?"
"Your position may be broken with this other - you need to broaden your point of view"
"Your position is untenable by the original, and you still state it - obtain another one"

It's easy to position by the words of other,
but it may be not the meaning you interpret,
and still when you get that position in your hands,
you place that meaning to others.

Get your own words and try to tell it better,
the world is always updating, you should do it too,
get ideas from others, it's a fair application
but transform it into knowledge, widen its point of view.

Now then, that the general statement is known to you,
it's time to consider your position and the Objective Motion.
After the fight, anger was prevented,
but what I wanted to say just stayed as a general idea.